Of the many, many pressing demands on general manager Ryan Johnson's time, one stands out: what to do with all these veterans.

Off Golden Pond

The Plan, as we all know, was to play well enough that the best defenceman in team history would stick around. Keep his friends here, hire the coach he liked, take wild swings at improbable targets. Ends up that wasn't the best possible tactic for sustainable improvement. Who knew?

He's long gone, of course. But what's left behind are some awkward contracts, both in length and offered trade protection. The push is clearly to continue collecting young talent, either as players or draft picks, and use that to build a contender. Those players are going to need time, on the ice and just chronologically, for this to happen.

That means folks have got to go.

Time, Gentlemen, Please!

An optimistic timeline for a full rebuild of the sort Vancouver needs can be broken into chunks. Both Johnson and new coach Manny Malhotra have signed three-year deals, and that's a decent length for a first chapter.

What's the goal for that time frame? It's not challenging for a Stanley Cup, obviously. So what fits in there? At least three years of high draft picks - and corresponding pain on the ice - is a minimum. The cap is rising substantially for the first time in years, so teams won't feel that crunch of talent getting more expensive and forcing their hands. Bad deals become relatively more affordable and excuses to keep players get easier.

In the next three years, the Canucks should be trying to get good prices on their veterans, ice time for their kids, and instilling pride of the work put in - even if results aren't there just yet. Ideally, the kids will take this time to develop enough that they replace the current veterans.

The trick is wanting Zeev Buium to grow into a number one defenceman and Marco Rossi to have a healthy, productive season while not contributing so much it ruins the draft slot. They want to work hard at getting a bottom-five finish. Signing the right veterans to do that with is a juggling act.

The Gall!

Getting paid to take bad contracts is a bit trickier now. For all the talk of taking Brendan Gallagher from the Montreal Canadiens, there may actually be some demand for his services. He's well respected around the league, but in a practical sense, he's the sort of player who is a luxury. A $6.5 million cap hit for a bottom-six, 30-ish point player is a lot, however hard he works.

If Vancouver did get him, or a player like him, the objective would be for a contender to pick him up for a playoff run, where that luxury can get full value. Then again, the complete lack of interest in Teddy Blueger at last season's deadline shows that the tactic doesn't always work. So that sort of veteran player needs to provide something else.

The best part of a veteran like Gallagher or Blueger is to provide a benchmark. Any young player coming up can be shown the veteran in practice and get told: "Want to play? Outwork him." And almost any veteran can briefly play up the lineup if needed, with little pressure to score. That versatility can be very useful when one of the young guys needs to take a step back, but should still be on the ice.

It's an important lesson. To have veterans is to maintain an even keel in a losing season. Young teams can run hot or cold, and having voices around that have been there before can temper the expectations. No losing streak lasts forever; it just feels like it. Encouragement from the coaching staff is good then, but so is it coming from the teammate who's got ten+ years in the league.

Here's Your Hat, What's Your Hurry

Right now, it's a two-way street. No player wants to move, even if they want a better situation. Can't blame them, really: moving's a pain. Five of Vancouver's most expensive skaters and both goalies have full no-move clauses right now. That puts a lot of the power in their hands, should the team want to deal them. And Drew O'Connor has a modified no-trade clause.

However, both Conor Garland and Tyler Myers have trade protection, and they weren't impossible to move. And all of these deals were signed under very different circumstances (see Win For Quinn, above). They might not be hard to convince that the grass is greener on the other side of the mountains.

The most obvious name is Jake DeBrusk. His cap hit is a perfectly reasonable number for a 25-goal scorer you pull your hair out over. We know he wants to stay in the West, but he also doesn't want to be part of a rebuilding team. Utah wants to reach the playoffs ASAP, maybe a deal can be reached involving RFA centre Barrett Hayton. He had a solid season in 2024-25, but regressed last year. Maybe the team can be convinced to finally cut bait on him. He's 26 years old, so not exactly the young guy the Canucks want, but getting some centre depth behind perpetually-injured Filip Chyil wouldn't hurt.

Beyond that, Vancouver needs to make some decisions. Filip Hronek is the best way the team can get the classic 3-P return: a first-round draft pick, a current player, and a good prospect. But Hronek also has value as a mentor, and that carries weight. He's expressly said he doesn't want to go anywhere, which is great. But it's a double-edged blade: he's an excellent player in a high-value position, so any return will be very good. But the Canucks defence is going to be so dang young around him that his voice can be a huge difference for them as they mature. He will also likely be worth just as much a year from now or the 2028 trade deadline - unless he gets injured. What does management consider the riskiest move?

Whether the team wants to move Hronek immediately or not, they could certainly ask Marcus Pettersson the DeBrusk question: Is this what you signed on for? Another five years at $5.5 million is a steep price for a rebuilding team, but maybe not one that's a playoff regular looking for more.

Drew O'Connor had a phenomenal year, and Linus Karlsson finally broke into the league in a big way, but those two players' values might never be higher. They may bring in disproportionately large returns right now for teams that are looking to get some skill in the bottom ranks. And as much as I like Nils Höglander, if another team makes an offer, well...

Oh, My Cost

I'm mentioning the price with each of these players because the Canucks ownership needs to be convinced to hold the line when things get a bit sparse. Interest IS going to go down with a losing team, future potential or no. Convincing them that the former cap masters can cruise very comfortably below that level can help gird their loins after two years of declining jersey sales. This doesn't mean they should yard sale the place, but picking and choosing who stays and who goes is a big deal.

Saving money on a higher cap hit than cash pay - like with Gallagher - can still appeal. It's better if they have some talent and want to be here, but beggars and choosers and all. Vancouver currently sits nearly $22 million below the salary cap with 21 players signed, about $5 million above the floor. The team has room to maneuver, if they wish. They'll probably have to carry three goaltenders, for all practical purposes, until Thatcher Demko shows he can play a year uninjured.

Bringing in a couple of guys of the type who can probably move at the deadline is the best choice, but they also need to make sure they have enough room for their kids to earn their place. And if the veterans get bumped, will that depress their value for future trades? It's a fine line, but also a selling point to potential free agents come mid-July. Come to Vancouver! Get a chance to play for a contract with someone else!

Fans of the team, rather than the players, should like what they see next year, even if it isn't often wins. Who knows? The prices may even come down enough to see the young guys live before they threaten glory.