Come For The Banter - Stay For The Disappointment
Nucks Fan Rebuild & Retool Center - Come For The Banter - Stay For The Disappointment
You never get a second chance to make a first impression, and while I was rather skeptical of the Sedin twins/Ryan Johnson hiring from the outset, I’m prepared now to be wrong.
In fact, some of the moves Johnson made in the last few days has put me in the uncomfortable position of feeling vaguely optimistic, which as a long-term Canucks fan invariably means I am failing to insulate myself from the inevitable disappointment that follows.
More than anything, I am heartened that the Vancouver Canucks do, indeed, appear to have fully embraced a rebuild.
Firstly, a wee while back, I listed the eight things I thought the team needed to do in order to move forward. In summary:
So, five out of eight, with bonus points for booting Jim Rutherford to pasture and moving Marcus Pettersson.
On Wednesday, Thursday rendered some opinions on recent moves, so I’m going to go another direction and make the declaration that the best move made July 1 that benefits the Canucks was one the Canucks had nothing to do with.
Hands up if you figured that the Edmonton Oilers would be able to unload the oppressive Darnell Nurse contract onto some other team dumb enough to overpay large bills for a second pair left-shot D-man. Yet the Oilers not only managed to unload Nurse to the Sharks, but a) gathered two prospects in return and more importantly b) didn’t have to retain salary.
To reflect on the Nurse saga for a moment, the Oilers signed a staggering $9.25 million annual deal, for a left-shot D-man who logged solid minutes but never really delivered the kind of numbers one would expect for a $9.25 million-per-year contract. Nurse was supposed to be an offensive threat, first-pair, lead-your-team kinda guy and never really was. Nurse wasn’t bad, but his efforts just could never match the salary, which led to all sorts of discontent with the fan base. Let me know when this sounds familiar, hmm?
The Nurse deal cracks open the window of potentiality to suggest – tantalizingly, perhaps – that at some point in the near future, some team might be willing to eat EP40’s contract and overpay for a defensively capable (when he doesn’t fall down) second-line centre who will probably chip in 70-80 points a year, but comes with baggage courtesy of a he-ain’t-worth-that $11.6 million price tag. The similarities are apparent.
It’s also somewhat refreshing to hear the new brass say, in fairly blunt terms, that Pettersson (the floppy forward) has not put in the summer work that a $11.6-million-per-year player should to meet the potential suggested by said contract.
My read at this moment is that the Canucks are going to give EP 40 one more chance to turn his failing career around, one more year to show something of the 100-point-per-year guy he once was. It is more than obvious that the Canucks had a woeful culture problem, and frankly, it’s also more than obvious that EP 40 is part of that problem. Now, I suspect, he’s going to have one year to change, to show that he hasn’t simply become the Canucks’ Darnell Nurse. But the Nurse deal suggests that if the right calls are mode, Johnson can move Pettersson to someone else without being utterly fleeced in the process.
The Hockey Gods have not been kind to Vancouver in the past, but the Montreal Canadiens gave Vancouver a prime prize in the form of Brendan Gallagher. Frankly, when I first read the details of the deal I had to pause for a moment and confirm with a secondary source because the idea of Montreal trading Gallagher for future considerations and retaining half his salary seemed absurd. Gallagher seems the kind of pepper-pot, never-stop guy that will do everything Conor Garland did on the energy-and-effort side of the equation.
Folks in the media have called the deal “free,” but I’m placing a lot of stock in the “future considerations” part of the piece, because it suggests that Johnson has made a quiet pledge to pick up the phone and call Montreal first if an asset feels like moving. Put a pin in that, because my spidey sense is tingling with a “let’s see if someone in Canuck colours moves to Montreal at or near the deadline if Montreal is in a strong playoff position at that time” kind of vibe. Think “hey, your goaltender is injured/not performing, but we have one we can flog you,” or – dare to dream – “we’ve got an overpaid but really good defensive second-line centre for that playoff run who is waiving his no-trade clause.”
Hands up if you were stunned at Marcus Pettersson being traded, because that came out of the blue. The fact Johnson peddled that for a 2030 first-rounder (which essentially means that Pettersson retained his value despite having a sucky year under Foote’s catastrophe of a “system”) tells me that the management is really thinking about the future. The player that pick will become is barely in puberty at this moment, and unless said pick is of the “can’t miss, plays at 19” class, won’t be in the lineup until the mid 2030s. That’s forward-thinking with vengeance.
Moving Nils Hoglander was good. Signing credible character athletes to short-term contracts that do not have full trade protection is a thankful sign that Johnson will not repeat the mistakes of the previous administrations. They didn’t hold on to Joseph. I trust Evander Kane won’t be involved in any future discussions, other than “good riddance to bad rubbish.”
Is there merit in re-signing Derek Forbort? The Jamie Oleksiak deal makes Forbort expendable, so probably not.
When will the team move Drew O'Connor?
Is Max Sasson a deadline trade chip?
Can EP40 be stripped of his alternate captaincy?
